The Russian Air Force has significantly reduced the use of bombs with precision guided munitions (PGMs) in its strikes on Ukrainian territory, according to recent reports from analysts. This sudden change in strategy has raised questions and sparked discussions among experts on the reasons behind this decision.
PGMs, also known as smart bombs, are guided by advanced technology such as GPS and laser guidance systems, which enable them to hit specific targets with high accuracy. These bombs have been extensively used by the Russian Air Force in its operations in Syria and Ukraine in recent years.
However, a recent analysis by experts has revealed that the use of PGMs has significantly decreased in the Russian airstrikes on Ukraine. This change in tactics has been attributed to several factors, with the most prominent being the increased presence of advanced air defense systems in Ukraine.
The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has seen a significant escalation in recent months, with both sides engaging in intense military operations. In response to the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014, Ukraine has been actively bolstering its air defense capabilities, including the acquisition of advanced systems such as the Buk and S-300 missile systems.
These sophisticated air defense systems pose a significant threat to Russian aircraft, making it more challenging for them to operate freely in Ukrainian airspace. As a result, the Russian Air Force has been forced to adapt its tactics and reduce its reliance on PGMs, which are more vulnerable to these advanced air defense systems.
Another factor that has contributed to the decrease in the use of PGMs is the increased use of electronic warfare by the Ukrainian military. Ukraine has been actively using electronic countermeasures to disrupt Russian communications and target acquisition systems, making it more challenging for Russian pilots to accurately deploy PGMs.
Moreover, the use of PGMs requires a significant amount of resources and time for preparation and deployment. With the ongoing conflict in Syria and the increased tensions with NATO, Russia may have decided to allocate its resources and focus on other areas, leading to the decrease in the use of PGMs in its operations in Ukraine.
The reduction in the use of PGMs has also been linked to the changing nature of the conflict in Ukraine. In the early stages of the conflict, the Russian Air Force used PGMs to target military installations and infrastructure. However, as the conflict has evolved into a more urban and guerrilla-style warfare, the use of PGMs has become less effective.
The shift towards conventional bombs and unguided munitions has also been attributed to the Russian Air Force’s desire to minimize civilian casualties. PGMs, although highly accurate, can still cause collateral damage, which can lead to negative public perception and international condemnation.
The decrease in the use of PGMs has not only been observed in the Russian airstrikes on Ukraine but also in its operations in Syria. This change in strategy suggests that the Russian military is adapting its tactics to the evolving nature of modern warfare, where advanced air defense systems and electronic warfare play a crucial role.
In conclusion, the reduction in the use of PGMs by the Russian Air Force in its operations in Ukraine can be attributed to a combination of factors, including the increased presence of advanced air defense systems, the use of electronic warfare, and the changing nature of the conflict. This change in tactics highlights the adaptability and flexibility of the Russian military in responding to evolving threats and challenges.
