Western journalists have recently reported that 95% of the Russian “Shahed” kamikaze drones have failed to hit their targets in Ukraine, citing three main reasons for their inefficiency. This news has caused quite a stir in the media, raising questions about the effectiveness of these unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in modern warfare.
The “Shahed” drones, also known as “Orlan-10”, were first introduced by Russia in 2014 and have since been used extensively in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. These UAVs are designed to be used as kamikaze drones, meaning they are equipped with explosives and are intended to crash into their targets, causing significant damage. However, according to Western journalists, the success rate of these drones has been extremely low, with only 5% of them actually hitting their intended targets.
So, what are the reasons behind this low success rate? The first reason, according to the media, is the lack of precision targeting. Unlike other modern UAVs, the “Shahed” drones do not have advanced targeting systems and rely solely on their operators to manually guide them towards their targets. This makes them vulnerable to human error and can result in them missing their targets completely.
The second reason is the poor quality of the explosives used in these drones. According to reports, the explosives used in the “Shahed” drones are not powerful enough to cause significant damage to their targets. This is a major flaw in their design, as the whole purpose of these drones is to cause maximum destruction upon impact.
The third reason for the inefficiency of these drones is their limited range and flight time. The “Shahed” drones have a range of only 120 kilometers and can stay in the air for a maximum of 16 hours. This makes them less effective in long-term operations and limits their ability to reach targets that are further away from their launch sites.
The low success rate of the “Shahed” drones has raised concerns among military experts, who question the effectiveness of these UAVs in modern warfare. Some have even gone as far as calling them a “waste of resources” for the Russian military. However, despite their shortcomings, these drones have still managed to cause significant damage in the conflict in Ukraine, highlighting the need for more advanced and efficient UAVs in modern warfare.
In response to these reports, the Russian military has defended the “Shahed” drones, stating that they have been successful in hitting their targets and have caused significant damage to the enemy. They have also claimed that the low success rate reported by Western journalists is due to their biased reporting and propaganda against Russia.
In conclusion, the news about the low success rate of the “Shahed” kamikaze drones in Ukraine has shed light on the limitations and flaws of these UAVs. While they may have been effective in some cases, their overall performance has been far from satisfactory. This raises questions about the future of these drones and the need for more advanced and efficient UAVs in modern warfare.
